I haven’t played with one at all, but perhaps the PHGM-19] planetary gearhead motor would be an option, here. The stats sound like a standard 500-class motor, which would be somewhat equivalent to what you’ve got in the Stinger. You could probably replace the stock motor with your Stinger, and maybe get a performance boost.
Ooh… Just had a thought. [size=67](that always hurts)
On the other hand, perhaps this isn’t the best approach to take, after all. I just remembered an important aspect of R/C motors: timing.
The position of the brushes in relation to the magnets make them more efficient at rotating in one direction over the other when running at speed. In higher-performance motors, the brushes are accessible, rather than being enclosed in the motor can, and can be replaced with “timed” brushes to advance th etiming for more speed, or retard it for more torque. For running in modified classes, they have motors with adjustable endbells, which allow standard brushes to be rotated, so you get maximum contact area and pressure, while still adjusting the timing for the performance you want.
Translation: Depending on its design, your stinger may not spin with the same speed and/or torque in when reversed. This would translate to uneven performance, even when fed through identical gearboxes on either side of a robot chassis - your robot would arc to one side or the other. dynamic speed control and a good PID algorythm could probably compensate for some of this arcing, but the differences can be fairly dramatic, particularly with large timing differences.
If it’s a “zero-degree” motor, you would get approximately the same performance in either direction, but with the Stinger being a closed-can type of motor, you won’t be able to adjust the timing if it’s not. If I recall correctly, stock class motors used to have around 24 degrees of non-adjustable advance timing built into them, meaning that there was a marked difference in their performance between running in clockwise and counterclockwise directions.
Keep in mind that the last time I raced was in the early 1990s, so things have probably changed a lot since then. You may actually have a zero-degree motor, which will run equally well both directions, or you may not. If you can, take a current reading with the motor running in one direction, and then in the other. Keep in mind that these beasts will draw a whole lot of amps, particularly when loaded, so make sure you use an ammeter than can handle the oomph. At the very least, make sure you know how to change the fuse in your meter’s ammeter section, and have spares handy before you start. (I’ve killed a few meters this way)[/size]