Hi,
Here are answers to your questions and comments:
Unfortunately, this is not something that is possible at this time with current technology in a way that is cost effective. You may be aware of various robots that perform some of those tasks, such as:
folding: youtube.com/watch?v=rl7iNRdTncQ (~16000 $)
folding: youtube.com/watch?v=2Uay9hzwusk (~ 980$)
food making: iflscience.com/technology/robot-chef-home-could-arrive-2017/ (~15000 $)
cleaning (vaccums): robotshop.com/en/robot-vacuums.html
cleaning (windows): robotshop.com/en/robotic-window-cleaners.html
cleaning (pools): robotshop.com/en/robot-pool-cleaners.html
The reason why these robots are so specific is because general robots (that can do many tasks) are very complicated to make reliably.
Therefore, you want a robot that is simply a mechanical assembly of actuators? Also, handling the balancing of such a robot will most certainly need on-board computing capability, as doing this remotely (ex: over WiFi, Bluetooth, etc.) would most likely be too slow to be effective (not to mention too unreliable).
You mention “industrial use” and house cleaning, food processing, textile handling, which in a robotics sense would mean the ability to produce quite a bit of force to achieve most of these tasks. Simple tasks to humans are actually quite complex to do in robotics effectively.
Here are some examples of simple hands that we offer:
robotshop.com/en/mechax-robot-right-hand-upgraded.html
robotshop.com/en/qbhand-robot-hand.html
robotshop.com/en/robotiq-adaptive-gripper.html (this one is a high quality, industrial grade gripper hand)
robotshop.com/en/brunel-robot-hand-right.html
Actually, the whole thing is a complex project (mechanical, electrical, control, etc.). Indeed, each “task” you may want to do may end up being its own complex project.
As you can see above, even simple parts of what you are aiming at are quite expensive. Humanoid-sized robots that are fully automated typically run well over 200 k$.
We recommend that you have a look at our humanoid robots available here.
Sincerely,