It sounds like a good idea of using a more robust power connector. I use both VS1 and VS2 because Iām using two UBEC switch regulators. I think having both VS1 and VS2 would also be useful if you want to combine different power sources (read voltage levels). I think the Hitec robot servos 5990 support 7,4 volt, so combining them with smaller servo for 6v or 4,8v would be easier with two power connections.
Of course there are always other solutions to distribute the power, but if you find place on the board for two connectors that would be great.
Since the ground are common. What about a power-connector with three pins/sockets? That would save some place I thinkā¦
I sometimes use both sets not for multiple power supplies but as a simple way to daisy chain power to a couple of boards
Sounds good to have the bootloader and the possibility of maybe hooking up an ICE to it, even if it is external, but I will also have to decide on how much to invest in this platform. If you are still looking at platforms, I still reasonably like the Renesas H8 series of processors that are underlying the Atom Pros or possibly the H8S, they come in many configurations for both 3v to 5v rangesā¦
My guess is that any of us who wish to contribute or build our own versions will end up using the student version of the Compliler as I believe the main version costs about $500.
Iāll try to reply to several comments and questions that people have had.
This board is planned to be 2-layer, and I think this will be doable.
I havenāt forgotten about the request for a jumper for Vref selection. Using a 64-pin processor, the Vref pins are brought to 2 analog inputs, so they would be available (optionally) as 2 of the 16 analog inputs. With the 80-pin processor I would be able to bring them to pads or pins.
Regarding Jimās comment above about current capacity with the single connector, I would say that the single larger connector will handle 30A as well as the existing connector handles 15A That is, the connector is not rated for that high a current continuously, but should handle it intermittently.
Iāll try to squeeze in a VS2 if possible, but it will get really tight on that end of the board.
Daisy chaining power using the VS1/VS2 connections should be done with caution, since it could mean a lot of current in the connectors and in the VS2=VS1 jumper.
Somebody mentioned 5V ARMs by Atmel. Those chips are large (144 pins minimum) and lack internal flash. I think they target a different kind of board.
Finally, the H8 is a nice product, but does it have an inexpensive C compiler? I have ruled out any processor family that lacks inexpensive tools, both for myself and for others that might want to program for it.
GCC is available for at least some of the Renesas processors, but I donāt know if that covers the H8 series or not. I just did some quick googling for H8 tools, but itās a bit confusing exactly what is and isnāt supported. There is support for the H8/300 series, but it appears one has to build their own toolchain, and thatās what has put me off from doing more with the H8 (I have at least 3 H8/36077 starter kits).
GCC is installed when one installs the Basic Micro IDEs, so maybe this could be used. However, this is good only for Windows.
I know GCC is available for the SuperH and M32R processors. I really like the Renesas processors, but am leaning more towards concentrating on AVRs and ARM just because I canāt learn them all (but wish I could).
How is the NG coming along? Iām getting much more interested in AVRs since I got my Arduino and started tinkering with it. There is a controller called the Axon that is $124.95, but I am hoping the NG will come out at a lower price. Otherwise, the Axon is my only real choice for the features I want.