Gentle persons:
I just downloaded most of the SES database entries. First, let me say I am grateful to all those who did the hard work to create these models. I hope to reciprocate. The following represents nothing more than a little nitpicking on my part.
It seems that the entries for ASB-22 and ASB-24 are duplicates of the entry for ASB-21, image and all. Just for grins, I tried to reach models for ASB-22 and ASB-24 by changing the ASB-21 file names appropriately. No joy. I guess these parts haven’t been modeled yet(?).
Many of the SES models are available in different file formats, often associated with different contributors. I suggest it would be useful to include an additional datum indicating model parentage.
For example, I look at the first entry, for “Servo [Standard Size Hitec]”, and see four files:
o [Alibre Designs] by linuxguy
o .igs] by linuxguy
o [Solidworks 2005] by ???
o [Step AP214] by linuxguy
It might seem reasonable to assume that the Alibre Design, IGES, and STEP files all represent a model that was created in Alibre Design (but you know what they say about assume). Then, does the Solidworks file represent the same model (re)created in Solidworks by importing one of linuxguy’s files or does it represent a different model created directly in Solidworks (or, vice versa, is the Alibre Design model new or a descendent of the Solidworks model)? For simplicity, I haven’t included the possibility that third-party software products, of which there are many, were used to translate among the modeling file formats.
For simple parts this matters very little but for more complicated parts and for assemblies it can matter a great deal in terms of what one can do with the result (I still bear scars from some disasters in my former professional life to prove it).
Even a simple notation like N for “new” model, T[modelx] for “translated” from modelx and B[modelx] for “based on” modelx, in the case that the model was rebuilt in the new system, would be useful.
Like I said, these musings are mere nitpicks. I’m grateful I have available this “kit of part models” with which I can quickly build up and test my ideas for a robot. Thanks.
Regards,
Kent
PS - for some CAD file formats one can capture the same information directly in the file but this isn’t generally so; besides, one ought to be able to find out without having to load the file into an appropriate system.
PPS - Now that I’m retired, I’m pretty much using only Alibre Design because of my new-found appreciation of the cost of software. Gone are the days when I had one of every commercial 3D modeling system at my fingertips!