Because there is a version of the Sabertooth 2x10 that is only R/C. It’s a little cheaper, and for that reason people will use the Sabertooth with the SSC-32. If you’re not using servos, then sure the 2x10 for serial would make more sense. But if you’re using some servos on your bot, it may be better to plug up to a channel on the SSC-32.
In addition to the motors, there are 10 HS-645MG servos on Regis, and we’re planning on adding some buttons and touch sensor too. So we need the SSC-32. And it’s more convenient to also control the Sabertooth through the SSC-32 than to run a second serial line into the Gumstix.
Excellent bot design, and I agree, too many bots have the cams where they wont do much good. Take the hexapods for example. The cam looks “natural” on the front end where a head would logically go, but be far more useful mounted on a scorpion style tail off the rear.
As for Regis, another segment on that crab arm and he could probably change his own tires! The ability for a bot to do mechanical maintenance on itself in the field (even if that field is your living room carpet) would be cool AND practical
I will be shipping the kits with the Proline Masher 2000 until I get stock of the better wheels. I do not know what is taking so long. I have had them on order for a long time, but still nothing.
Sometimes, a person (like me, for instance) is replacing continuous rotation servos with motors, and code is already written for direct control of two servo motors. The transition to using motors with a controller like the Sabertooth is much easier if it can be made to work with existing code first. In my case, it’s a matter of not wanting to immediately rewrite any code and to work with something I already know the behaviors of before getting into using the other modes the Sabertooth has.
It’s also a matter of needing both servos and motors on a robot. Servos to control sensor turrets, arms, grippers, etc, and motors for locomotion. Therefore, both the Sabertooth and SSC-32 would be needed.