New Wireless Device Server from Lantronix stacking board

I am hoping on a bit more range than that with an actual wlan connection. Already have the boards built and should have a matchport later this week so I will see how it works then.

A big part of this was just a learning experience / excuse for me anyway. The quality of the PCBs from batchPCB was decent and I have no complaints with the cost. For the MatchPort I don’t have a specific application in mind. Making a simple and tested PCB design available for anyone else desiring to use it was as much a goal as anything.

From the learning part though I already have another personal PCB project sketched up for my ROV once I get some info from a co-worker. Compared to some of what I do for work it’s not a big deal but then again I only need 1 board and I sure don’t need the $150 of NRE/tool charges either. This entire MatchPort project was less than that and I think the process is easy to replicate on more complicated stuff so I personally feel like it was worth the expense.

Ok so here are pics of the MatchBoard as it is assembled

Bare PCB
http://users.adelphia.net/~eballou/MatchBoard/2149.JPG
SMD parts installed
http://users.adelphia.net/~eballou/MatchBoard/2152.JPG
TH parts installed
http://users.adelphia.net/~eballou/MatchBoard/2154.JPG
MatchPort installed
http://users.adelphia.net/~eballou/MatchBoard/2155.JPG
Side view of the completed assembly
http://users.adelphia.net/~eballou/MatchBoard/2156.JPG

Fuzzy pic of the MatchBoard mounted to an SSC-32 and the bracket used on the BRAT, but you get the idea anyway. Could just as easily be an ABB.
http://users.adelphia.net/~eballou/MatchBoard/2157.JPG

Other than making sure the regulator was providing the 3.3V I have not had an opportunity to test this yet. Probably be later this week or this weekend.

EB
:mrgreen:

Thats a nice new toy ya got there! :wink: I’m looking forward to getting my hands on one of those this summer. :laughing:

OMG Eddie! It looks perfect! Very well layed out, and correct me if I’m wrong, but are those Fiducials I see on the board? :open_mouth:

I mean just look at the potential Eddie…

http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/1725/rnowpd7.jpg

LMAO! Print it!!! :smiley: :smiley:

oh. my. head. :unamused:

someone has entirely way too much free time.
:slight_smile:

I do have lots of free time after work, however, you never answered my question Eddie… are those Fids you put on your match box?

P.S. Glad you liked the graphic :laughing:

Yeah, but the one in the plane area is wrong and shoud have had a cutout around it. I’ll fix it before I find a place to put the gerbers.

[size=75]edited out a spelling typo[/size]

That’s amazing. :smiley: :slight_smile: :open_mouth: :laughing: 8) :stuck_out_tongue: :wink: :mrgreen:

EddieB, you going to make those boards available? I got an email from someone interested…

they are essentially a wifi board correct? if so, i think i would be interested in one of them too :slight_smile:

Honest to god I’ve been bouncing between home projects and the ABB+BAP I bought that I’ve not done much more than power it up.

I did run into a ā€œwhat is more usefulā€ situation with it though. Right now RS232 is connected as a DCE pinout with a DB9-Female, just like the ABB and SSC-32. This works fine if you are connecting the serial port to a PC. In application though the MatchPort becomes the host and you are emulating the PC port end via a wireless connection. So it seems to me that a DTE pinout DB9-Male connection would make more sense. The trade off is if you want to configure it using the serial port from the PC you would need a null-modem connection. Everything else you would connect it to would be a normal straight cable (or use the TTL header and bypass the DB9 entirely.)

Let me swap the DB9 type and fix the silkscreen errors and I’ll e-mail you the schematic and gerbers tomorrow after lunch EST and you can do what you would like with them.

EB
:mrgreen:

Jim did you get those files ok? Is it explained well enough or do you need more information from me? Btw, all the parts on the BOM are RoHS compatible so anybody should be able to buy/build and use the thing… even in the EU :stuck_out_tongue: :unamused: :smiley:

That is extraordinary, Eddie! My hat goes off to you!

Beautiful!

theChipmunk

Hello EddieB, honestly the whole thing dropped off my radar. I will ask Beth to set the files on the server and we will link them here. I have too many iron on the fire to take on the board right now. :frowning:

Heh, no problem. I figured it was something like that but was not going to pester you about it either. I am actually looking at using one of mine for real here in a couple of weeks so that’ll be fun. The coding stuff has backed off in the last week or two here at work so I am actually looking forward to doing some more work on my projects at home. 8)

Hey EddieB,

Any chance of getting a look at the files for this board?
I have a wiport that I just made a header board for, but am wondering what you came up with here?
Would you be able to email them to me? Only if you don’t mind.

Jim said he was going to ask Beth to put them on a server and link them so they will be available shortly I’d think.

I should point out that this board is for the Lantronix MatchPort not WiPort. Very different animal as the WiPort has a lot more stuff inside. The MatchPort is a simplified version that seems optimized for wireless use with their com port redirector.

I actually have some artwork started for the WiPort modules but it seems like everyone is so focused on cost that I didn’t bother to finish it. I really think that unless you need the (up to two) 930kbps serial channel(s) or have requested the CPK to develop your own applications for the WiPort that the MatchPort is the way to go. It is about half the price and has one 230kbps serial channel. I can make a WiPort breakout board if there is some real interest but it would be like a month before I get boards laid out, back from batchpcb, and built to test so it would not be a ā€œquickā€ thing.

Thanks Eddie.

Looks like I’ll be sticking with what I have, It does the trick, so it’s all good.
It’s a pitty I got my WiPort before the MatchPort was released, or I would have gone for that, but you get that. It’ll be MatchPort for me next time (if there is a next time soon). Thanks again.