Is this something to bookmark? Anyone have experience with bildr yet? Does it apply to LMR as well?
[edit: LMR-II does support vimeo embedding!]
https://vimeo.com/6842613Is this something to bookmark? Anyone have experience with bildr yet? Does it apply to LMR as well?
[edit: LMR-II does support vimeo embedding!]
https://vimeo.com/6842613As for now it’s just a
As for now it’s just a website communicating an idea.
But isn’t it just a wiki with modular approach?
Let’s monitor
Let’s keep an eye out. It is specifically mentioning our main two micro controllers. And it speaks of cooperation between components in a way that artsies van make use of techies work.
Should be interesting for many of us here. Time will tell.
I agree. But rather
I agree. But rather sceptical to one-man-projects aiming to "cover everything, in detail."
Well, look what I just found
Well, look what I just found on Google, while trying to find info on bildr.org: LMR is talking about Bildr. And that is what is most important, according to Google
most important indeed
How else would they get traffic? Makezine? Puhlease!
were you logged in?
Were you logged in with your google account? Those bigbro’s know who you are, yaknow! They show you exactly what they think you wanna see!!! And then they steal your soul. Without even paying…
Yer, well, I was… Google is
Yer, well, I was… Google is not the same anymore, I know. There where a time where a man had a rank!
So isn’t this like object
So isn’t this like object oriented programming theory brought to building components? At least thats what my take on it was…
I think this is kind of
I think this is kind of lame. It’s going to attract people who don’t really want to learn how to do something, and just want a cookie cutter solution (“plz post code, kthx”). How many ways are there to build a headlamp for a bike? Do we only want ONE to be the one showcased by the site? How about if that was a wheeled robot platform? Only one of those? And just think of how much work it’s going to take to get people to write their code to use a colour sensing module in every different PIC package? What if code on the site requires your PIC chip to use PORTD, but the chip you have doesn’t have PORTD?
Something I do like about this is the idea of a centralized knowledge base. I think a better solution would be to have a search function that indexes sites and forums containing key words that users search, such as the colour sensing module. All sites pertaining to colour sensing modules are saved and a new page is formed with sites listed such as where to buy, forums, datasheets…etc…A lot of the work this site is proposing to do is already done, like on here!
Sorry for the rant, just my 2 cents, hehe.
- P
I guess the more important
I guess the more important question is, is there anything we think is missing or could be improved from LMR?
Who’s ready to start the forum post for features for LMR III?
(Just teasing, guys. LMR II rocks!)