Please try to answer all questions… It makes helping much easier.
Some in focus images of the SSC-32 and it’s power wiring would help out a lot.
Please try to answer all questions… It makes helping much easier.
Some in focus images of the SSC-32 and it’s power wiring would help out a lot.
here’s the answer
1-program i’m using :powerpod
2-when clicking on all 1500 all servo’s take the mid position yes
The slider in Powerpod will only effect the selected servo, and it moves it pretty small amount. If you’re not looking at the right servo you may not even notice it moving.
okay ,but when i tried using the lynxterm ,all servos moves a full rotation,
anyway thank you very much for help
Lynxterm is moving the servo it’s full rotation.
PowerPod is moving the servo only 15 degrees max for calibration.
The two purposes are completely different.
Aha , i see , thanx “robot dude”
i appreciate your cooperation
Hiya anyone. I bought a CH3 -R for the students in my school. We built it but cannot communicate with the Basic Atom Pro 28. Has anyone got a diagram/picture of how to connect the SSC 32 and Bot Board II with the Basic Atom Pro 28 i.e which jumpers to connect/remove and where to plug the serial connector from the computer. When we try to programme the microprocessor the Basic Atom Pro IDE says there is no communication with the chip. Please help
Already answered on different thread.
Please don’t double post.
Thanks
Kurt
hiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Mr. Ahmed
i need your help if you can send me modeling (kinematic+inverse and etc.) or anything that help me about BH3-R robot
i am ms.c. student in research stage in the control engineering
thank
thanx, i’m using the powerpod program ,
but the slider worked successfully on the lynx term program ,
Can you tell us more about your setup? It’s hard to provide specific help without any details.
Hello… everyone I was wondering if anyone has any experience
or have u any information about 3 factors i needed in my research
(Precision,Friction,Motion) i need values of these factors of (BH3-R hexapod Robot ) plz. thanks for all…
these factors are tooo important to me .
Hello… everyone I was wondering if anyone has any experience
or have u any information about 3 factors i needed in my research
(Precision,Friction,Motion) i need values of these factors of (BH3-R hexapod Robot ) plz. thanks for all…
these factors are tooo important to me .
Can you clarify what you need exactly and perhaps the focus of the research? You indicate you need:
Precision: This can be for each servo, for the end point of each leg, for the overall motion etc.
Friction: There is friction everywhere in the system, do you mean in the legs, body, servos?
Motion: What about the motion do you need?
thanks for ur answer Mr.
my research is path planning hexapod (BH3-R)
i had finished kinematic and inverse of Bh3-R hexapod robot and iths static stability analysis , i just have walking my robot from start point to goal point using Genetic algorithm , i get paper very good for complete my path planning (BH3-R hexapod robot) .
the paper is about rectangular hexapod but my robot (round hexapod ) so i must change kinematic +inverse of paper with kinematic +inverse of my Robot .
my problem is in fitness function with three factors
(Precision,Friction,Motion) i did not understanded these factors of servo or of body …etc.and if these factors is the same factors if i use round robot instead of rectangular hexapod in the paper. i am M.S.c student from iraq and this research is new and i have read all time to help myself
i implement the table 2 (chromosome ) and get the same results of table expect fitness i want these factors of BH3-R robot to implement fitness
thank u very much …i hope u can help me
my atachment is servo type hs-485 HB and paper and in last many months i connect robot and opreate it on tripod gait now i want to apply this paper to my therotical resualts .
gentic =final.pdf (651 KB)
thanks for ur answer Mr.
my research is path planning hexapod (BH3-R)
i had finished kinematic and inverse of Bh3-R hexapod robot and iths static stability analysis , i just have walking my robot from start point to goal point using Genetic algorithm , i get paper very good for complete my path planning (BH3-R hexapod robot) .
the paper is about rectangular hexapod but my robot (round hexapod ) so i must change kinematic +inverse of paper with kinematic +inverse of my Robot .
my problem is in fitness function with three factors
(Precision,Friction,Motion) i did not understanded these factors of servo or of body …etc.and if these factors is the same factors if i use round robot instead of rectangular hexapod in the paper. i am M.S.c student from iraq and this research is new and i have read all time to help myself
i implement the table 2 (chromosome ) and get the same results of table expect fitness i want these factors of BH3-R robot to implement fitness
thank u very much …i hope u can help me thanks for ur answer Mr.
my research is path planning hexapod (BH3-R)
i had finished kinematic and inverse of Bh3-R hexapod robot and iths static stability analysis , i just have walking my robot from start point to goal point using Genetic algorithm , i get paper very good for complete my path planning (BH3-R hexapod robot) .
the paper is about rectangular hexapod but my robot (round hexapod ) so i must change kinematic +inverse of paper with kinematic +inverse of my Robot .
my problem is in fitness function with three factors
(Precision,Friction,Motion) i did not understanded these factors of servo or of body …etc.and if these factors is the same factors if i use round robot instead of rectangular hexapod in the paper. i am M.S.c student from iraq and this research is new and i have read all time to help myself
i implement the table 2 (chromosome ) and get the same results of table expect fitness i want these factors of BH3-R robot to implement fitness.my atachment is servo type hs-485 HB and paper and in last many months i connect robot and opreate it on tripod gait now i want to apply this paper to my therotical resualts .
thank u very much …i hope u can help me
There was not a lot of theory which went into the creating of these first generation walking robots - friction was something simply to be “overcome” as opposed to calculated, while precision was only minimally factored into which servos were selected. The walking gaits were created in order to have the robots appear to walk smoothly, but energy consumption was not a big factor. Unfortunately we don’t have much additional information we can provide in this regard aside from spec sheets.
**
thank u dear
what do u mean in precision was only minimally factored into which servos were selected and how much **